A Hierarchical Bayes Model for Ranked Conjoint Data
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper investigates the adequacy of the hierarchical Bayes (HB) model for rankbased conjoint data. While recent research has demonstrated the robustness of the HB model compared to traditional estimation methods for rank based conjoint models, we conduct an indepth analysis of the underlying reasons of these findings. Hereby we investigate the fundamental assumptions of rank based conjoint models in order to explain problems concerning information loss by using ranking methods. In particular, we expose the ambiguity of rank orders and the inherent ambiguity of part-worth estimates. Propositions conform to requisite traits postulated by the model of rank based conjoint data are elaborated. We point out existing shortfalls of traditional estimation methods since they do not fulfill the requirements of rank based conjoint data. In contrast, the HB model explicitly involves the stochastic modeling of deviations at individual and super-population level. Thus we postulate a superior adequacy of the HB model versus OLS and LINMAP. In order to investigate this hypothesis, a comparison of the estimation accuracy is performed by using simulated data. The simulation results show the superiority of the HB model in terms of minimizing the absolute deviations of part-worth estimates from their true values and consequently in generating parameters which reflect the true nature of the data.
منابع مشابه
Foundations of Stated Preference Elicitation Consumer Choice Behavior, Measurement of Consumer Welfare, and Choice-based Conjoint Analysis
This paper re-examines the discrete choice methods and stated preference elicitation procedures that are commonly used in choice-based conjoint analysis. The aim is to clarify their domains of applicability and provide reliable techniques for data collection and analysis. CONTENTS Topic Page Preface 2 1 Choice Behavior and Consumer Welfare 2 1.1 Utility 5 1.2 Choice Probabilities 8 1.3 Consumer...
متن کاملReal world performance of choice-based conjoint models
Conjoint analysis is one of the most important tools to support product development, pricing and positioning decisions in management practice. For this purpose various models have been developed. It is widely accepted that models that take consumer heterogeneity into account, outperform aggregate models in terms of hold-out tasks. The aim of our study is to investigate empirically whether predi...
متن کاملDirect Elicitation of Indirect Preferences
This paper re-examines the discrete choice methods and stated preference elicitation procedures that are commonly used in choice-based conjoint analysis. The aim is to clarify their domains of applicability and provide reliable techniques for data collection and analysis. CONTENTS Topic Page Preface 2 1 Choice Behavior and Consumer Welfare 2 1.1 Utility 5 1.2 Choice Probabilities 8 1.3 Consumer...
متن کاملFast Polyhedral Adaptive Conjoint Estimation
We propose and test new adaptive question design and estimation algorithms for partialprofile conjoint analysis. Polyhedral question design focuses questions to reduce a feasible set of parameters as rapidly as possible. Analytic center estimation uses a centrality criterion based on consistency with respondents’ answers. Both algorithms run with no noticeable delay between questions. We evalua...
متن کاملGreedoid-Based Noncompensatory Inference
G languages provide a basis to infer best-fitting noncompensatory decision rules from full-rank conjoint data or partial-rank data such as consider-then-rank, consider-only, or choice data. Potential decision rules include elimination by aspects, acceptance by aspects, lexicographic by features, and a mixed-rule lexicographic by aspects (LBA) that nests the other rules. We provide a dynamic pro...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005